Bill Penny
Bill Penny

Bill Penny is in the Nashville office of Stites & Harbison and is a member of the firm's Environmental, Natural Resources and Energy Service Group. He has more than 25 years experience in environmental law. He may be contacted at william.penny@stites.com.

Bill Penny
Christina Davidow

Christina Bodewig Davidow is an Associate in the Nashville office of Stites & Harbison and a LEED Accredited Professional. She is a member of both the Environmental, Natural Resources and Energy Service Group as well as the Green Industry Practice Group. She may be contacted at christina.davidow@stites.com.

climate change

When the SEC Tells You How to Embrace Climate Change, Your Business Should Listen!

02.03.10 9:04 AM
posted by Christina Davidow

Last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) voted to provide the public with an interpretive guidance document of its disclosure requirements regarding climate change.  

The SEC is an independent agency of the United States government with primary responsibility for enforcing the federal securities laws and regulating the securities industry. 
 
Existing SEC rules require businesses to “disclose the impact that business or legal developments related to climate change may have on its business. The relevant rules cover a company's risk factors, business description, legal proceedings, and management discussion and analysis.”  According to the SEC’s press release, the interpretive guidance sheds light on the following issues that may be affected by climate change:
 
Legislation and Regulation: A company should consider whether the impact of certain existing laws and regulations regarding climate change may impact current business operations (or potential impact of pending legislation). It may be required to disclose such impacts because such legislation might impact a company's bottom line.
 
International Accords: A company should consider, and disclose when material, the risks or effects on its business of international accords and treaties relating to climate change.  For instance, the Kyoto Protocol, recent discussions in Copenhagen, and the European Union Emissions Trading System may impact a company's operations, and consequently, its bottom line.
 
Indirect Consequences of Regulation or Business Trends: A company should consider, for disclosure purposes, the actual or potential indirect consequences it may face due to climate change related regulatory or business trends, such as the effects of legal, technological, political and scientific developments regarding climate change on current business practices.  For instance, an indirect consequence might be that legislation affects a supplier company that would have the effect of causing a spike in the supplier's product.  In turn, your company would have to bear the pass-through increased costs. Conversely, indirect costs may affect a company in a positive way if the company takes advantage of climate change and develops new products that are in demand because of climate change.  Both these scenarios have the potential to impact a company's bottom line.
 
Physical Impacts of Climate Change: Companies may be required to disclose the actual and potential material impacts of environmental matters on their business.  For instance, in an increasingly cold climate, air conditioners may not be as popular as they are in a warmer climate.  This may have the potential of impacting a company's bottom line.
 

tags: Climate Change SEC interpretive guidance international accords Securities and Exchange Commission

Leave a Comment

epa

Proposed Budget for the EPA's Seven Key Themes

02.01.10 4:14 PM
posted by Christina Davidow

Earlier today, the Obama Administration proposed a budget of $10 billion for the EPA. According to the EPA’s press release, “[t]his budget heeds the president’s call to streamline and find efficiencies in the agency’s operations while supporting the seven priority areas EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson outlined to guide EPA’s work.”

 The Budget, like Administrator Jackson's seven key themes, focused in on the following areas:
 
1) Cleaning up communities: This budget includes $1.3 billion to address Superfund sites; $215 million is provided to help Brownfields’ redevelopment;  $27 million for EPA’s new Healthy Communities Initiative that will address community water, green and healthy schools, air toxics monitoring in at-risk communities; and encourage sustainability.
 
2) Improving Air Quality: This budget includes $60 million to support state efforts to implement updated National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA recently tightened NO2 standards and this budget will go, in part, toward helping states achieve these standards.
 
3) Building Strong State and Tribal Partnerships: This budget includes $1.3 billion for state and tribal grants.
 
4) Taking Action on Climate Change: This budget includes $43 million for miscellaneous efforts to address climate change.
 
5) Protecting America’s Waters: This budget includes $63 million for efforts to protect and restore the Chesapeake Bay and $17 million for the Mississippi River Basin. The budget contemplates investing $3.3 billion to “maintain and improve outdated water infrastructure and keep our wastewater and drinking water clean and safe.”
 
6) Assuring the Safety of Chemicals: Allots $56 million for chemical assessment and risk review in an effort to “ensure that no unreasonable risks are posed by new or existing chemicals.”
 
7) Expanding the Conversation on Environmentalism and Working for Environmental Justice: $8 million for programs dealing with environmental justice.

tags: budget 7 themes Obama Jackson EPA

Leave a Comment

green building

ASHRAE 189.1: Complimenting LEED in a Mandatory Way?

01.28.10 8:57 AM
posted by Christina Davidow

ASHRAE 189.1 was approved by ANSI on January 22, 2010, and published as a standard on January 26, 2010.  

ASHRAE 189.1 is the fruit of the collaboration between the American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IES), and the United States Green Building Council (USGBC).  189.1 is a new standard for the design of commercial High-Performance Green Buildings and is being finalized such that it can be adopted by states and incorporated into their building codes. This new ANSI standard, if adopted by a state, will apply to new construction and major renovation, except for low-rise residential buildings, and will address “site sustainability, water use efficiency, energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality (IEQ), and the building’s impact on the atmosphere, materials and resources.”

ASHRAE 189.1 was designed to provide a green foundation for buildings, and is set to compliment LEED requirements.  Unlike LEED, however, ASHRAE 189.1 was created with an eye toward being incorporated into building codes, which would require mandatory compliance.

Many thanks to Angela Stephens for making us aware of this development!

For a preview of ASHRAE 189.1 from the ASHRAE website, click here.

 

tags: ASHRAE 189.1 ANSI Green sustainability angela stephens USGBC

Leave a Comment

epa

Lisa Jackson's 7 Key Themes

01.12.10 4:50 PM
posted by Christina Davidow

 

In January 2009, at the beginning of Lisa Jackson’s tenure as EPA Administrator, she developed five goals for the EPA. 
 
Similarly, earlier today, Ms. Jackson again identified key themes to focus the work of the EPA. She said  that, in 2010, the EPA will focus on the following seven items: 
  1. Taking Action on Climate Change
  2. Improving Air Quality
  3. Assuring the Safety of Chemicals
  4. Cleaning Up Our Communities
  5. Protecting America’s Waters
  6. Expanding the Conversation on Environmentalism and Working for Environmental Justice
  7. Building Strong State and Tribal Partnerships
 EPA will continue to “carry out [its] mission by respecting [its] core values of science, transparency and the rule of law.”

 

tags: EPA themes 2010 Jackson

Leave a Comment

epa

WANT TO COMMENT ON EPA'S ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES?

01.10.10 9:48 AM
posted by Bill Penny

EPA is soliciting comments on its preliminary list of enforcement priorities for 2011-2013 fiscal year.  The Federal Register Notice, issued January 4, 2010, states that comments must be received by January 19, 2010 and the comment period will not be extended.  EPA's Enforcement Blog has links to information and background on the potential priorites.  In addition over 100 comments have been received since EPA first posted its blog. 

tags: EPA ENFORCEMENT

Leave a Comment